Firewood BTU Calculator
Labor estimate loading…
Pick species by MMBTU per cord, not by which cord is cheapest. Hickory delivers 27.7 and white oak 26.3 MMBTU per cord, while white pine holds only 15.9; that means a cord of pine gives you barely 60% of the heat a cord of hickory does, so a cheaper softwood cord often costs more per unit of heat once you do the math.[1]
Two cords at the same price can differ by 40% in the heat they deliver. This calculator ranks firewood species by BTU per cord and pairs it with your stove's efficiency, so you buy the most usable heat per dollar rather than the lowest sticker price.[0]
Live fuel prices by state
Retail residential prices from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Updated Jul 21, 2026
| Fuel | Price | $/million BTU | Data vintage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propane | $1.98/gal | $21.64 | U.S. average |
| Natural gas | $19.18/Mcf | $18.47 | U.S. average |
| Electricity | $0.1932/kWh | $56.63 | U.S. average |
Source: EIA Heating Oil & Propane Update · EIA Electricity Data · EIA Natural Gas Data
The cheap-cord trap
Why MMBTU per cord beats counting cords
A cord is a fixed stack of 128 cubic feet, but the heat inside it swings almost twofold depending on species. MMBTU per cord is the million BTU of stored energy in that stack: hickory holds 27.7 and white oak 26.3, while white pine holds just 15.9.[1] Two cords of pine roughly equal one cord of hickory for actual heat delivered, so the real question is never how many cords you have; it is how many MMBTU you stacked. Buy on energy content and a pricier dense hardwood usually wins on heat delivered.
Species heat content, ranked
| Species | MMBTU/cord | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Hickory | 27.7 | Overnight burns; hottest common species, splits hard |
| White oak | 26.3 | All-day workhorse heat; long clean burn |
| Red oak | 24.6 | Widely sold hardwood; needs long seasoning |
| Sugar maple | 24.0 | Steady daytime heat; splits easily |
| Lodgepole pine | 21.1 | Best softwood value; fast easy splitting |
| Birch | 20.8 | Quick-catching mixed loads; burns fast |
| Douglas fir | 20.7 | Shoulder-season heat in the West |
| Ash | 20.0 | Burns even when barely seasoned |
| White pine | 15.9 | Kindling and spring fires only |
All energy figures are EIA cordwood values.[1]
When softwood still makes sense
Lower BTU does not mean useless. Lodgepole pine holds 21.1 MMBTU per cord, more than birch or ash, and splits far easier while catching fast.[1] Ash's real edge is that it burns even when barely seasoned, so it saves you when you are caught short. White pine at 15.9 is the exception: reserve it for kindling and quick spring fires, never overnight loads. In much of the West, softwood is what is cheap and local, and a fast-lighting shoulder-season fire does not need oak-grade density.
Heat per dollar: the comparison that actually matters
To compare value, divide each species' delivered price by its MMBTU per cord, not by the stack. If a cord of dense oak at 26.3 MMBTU costs the same as a cord of pine at 15.9, the oak delivers about 65% more heat for the identical outlay.[1] The trap is a cheap softwood cord that looks like a deal until you realize you will burn through two of them to match one hardwood cord. Run your local delivered prices against these BTU figures before buying; paying more per cord for a dense hardwood is often the cheapest heat on the lot.
Your stove eats part of every BTU
None of these figures reach your room intact. An EPA-certified stove runs 63% to 83% efficient, so a cord of white oak's 26.3 MMBTU actually delivers roughly 16.6 to 21.8 MMBTU as usable heat.[4] That efficiency gap is wider than the difference between many species, so an old smoke-dragon stove wastes more heat than upgrading from maple to hickory would ever recover. Fix the stove before you fuss over the last MMBTU of species choice, and burn only well-seasoned wood; wet wood tanks efficiency and drives the smoke EPA warns about.[4]
Buy dense wood for the hours you can't tend the fire
Match species to burn duration. Hickory at 27.7 and white oak at 26.3 MMBTU per cord pack the most energy into each log, so they coal down slowly and hold overnight without a reload.[1] Save your hickory and oak for the last load before bed and the workday hours you are away; burn faster, lower-density species like birch or maple during the day when you are around to feed the stove.
Season by species, not by the calendar
Dense hardwoods carry more water and dry slower: red oak and white oak need a full one to two years split and stacked before they hit good burning moisture, while ash and softwoods are ready in months.[1] Buying oak green in fall to burn that same winter is the most common firewood mistake; it hisses, smokes, and gives up a fraction of its 24 to 26 MMBTU. Stack a year ahead or buy oak already seasoned.
Mix a fast-catcher with a long-burner
The best-value stack is not one species. Load a splittable, quick-lighting wood like lodgepole pine at 21.1 MMBTU or birch at 20.8 to establish the fire fast, then add dense oak or hickory once it is hot for the long haul.[1] This lets you spend hardwood money only where it pays off, on sustained heat, while cheaper local softwood does the lighting work.
| Rate | Range | Unit | What drives the spread | Source | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White oak BTU per cord | 26.3 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Quercus alba | [0] | 2026 |
| Red oak BTU per cord | 24.6 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Quercus rubra | [0] | 2026 |
| Sugar maple BTU per cord | 24 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Acer saccharum | [0] | 2026 |
| Hickory BTU per cord | 27.7 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Carya spp. | [0] | 2026 |
| Ash BTU per cord | 20 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Fraxinus spp. | [0] | 2026 |
| Birch BTU per cord | 20.8 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Betula spp. | [0] | 2026 |
| White pine BTU per cord | 15.9 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Pinus strobus | [0] | 2026 |
| Lodgepole pine BTU per cord | 21.1 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Pinus contorta | [0] | 2026 |
| Douglas fir BTU per cord | 20.7 | MMBTU/cord | EIA AER Table A2 — Pseudotsuga menziesii | [0] | 2026 |
| EPA-certified stove efficiency | 63–83 | % | EPA Burn Wise certified models | [2] | 2026 |
Rates current as of 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Is expensive hardwood actually worth it over cheap pine?
A cord of white pine holds 15.9 MMBTU; a cord of white oak holds 26.3.[1] That means you burn roughly 1.6 cords of pine to match one cord of oak for heat. Unless pine is dramatically cheaper per cord, the hardwood is cheaper per unit of heat. Compare delivered price divided by MMBTU, not price per cord.
Which firewood burns the hottest?
Hickory (27.7 MMBTU/cord) and white oak (26.3) lead the common species.[1] They burn hot, coal well, and hold overnight. The tradeoff: they split harder and cost more, so buy them for the loads you can't tend rather than every fire.
Does my wood stove change these BTU numbers?
The MMBTU figures are the energy stored in the wood. Your stove delivers only 63% to 83% of it as room heat.[4] So oak's 26.3 MMBTU per cord becomes roughly 16.6 to 21.8 usable. An efficient stove and dry wood matter more than squeezing out the last species upgrade.
Can I burn softwood in my wood stove at all?
Softwood is fine when seasoned. Lodgepole pine holds 21.1 MMBTU per cord, more than birch or ash.[1] It splits easily and catches fast, great for lighting and mild days. The real risk is burning it wet, which builds creosote and the smoke EPA flags as a health concern.[4] Keep it dry.
Why does my oak barely put out heat?
Oak carries heavy water and is the slowest common species to dry, needing one to two years split and stacked.[1] Burned green, most of its 24 to 26 MMBTU goes to boiling off water, not heating your room, and it smokes badly.[4] Check it with a moisture meter; you want it under about 20% before burning.